<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>G to The Square &#187; Guitar Hero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gtothesquare.com/tag/guitar-hero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gtothesquare.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Asus new Dual-Display concept is not “revolutionary”</title>
		<link>http://www.gtothesquare.com/2009/03/06/why-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gtothesquare.com/2009/03/06/why-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geries Handal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus Eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guitar Hero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebookreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtothesquare.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/why-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was reported on monday by notebookreview.com: “Asus shows off revolutionary new dual-display concept notebook”. Asus concept (source notebookreview.com) My question is: how come it wasn’t revolutionary when One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) announced a very similar concept almost a year ago, called the OLPC XO-2. Actually the the one by OLPC look cooler than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gtothesquare.com%2F2009%2F03%2F06%2Fwhy-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gtothesquare.com%2F2009%2F03%2F06%2Fwhy-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary%2F&amp;source=gtothesquare&amp;style=normal&amp;hashtags=Asus,Asus+Eee,Guitar+Hero,iphone,netbook,notebookreview,OLPC,Wii" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It was <a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4880" target="_blank">reported on monday</a> by notebookreview.com: “Asus shows off revolutionary new dual-display concept notebook”.</p>
<p><a href="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;display:inline;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" title="image" src="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image-thumb.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="197" /></a> <a href="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image1.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;display:inline;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" title="image" src="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image-thumb1.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="205" /></a></p>
<p>Asus concept (source notebookreview.com)</p>
<p>My question is: how come it wasn’t revolutionary when One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/first-look-olpc-xo-generation-20" target="_blank">announced a very similar concept</a> almost a year ago, called the OLPC XO-2.</p>
<p><a href="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image2.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;display:inline;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" title="image" src="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image-thumb2.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="175" /></a> <a href="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image3.png"><img style="border-right:0;border-top:0;display:inline;border-left:0;border-bottom:0;" title="image" src="http://gtothesquare.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/image-thumb3.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="191" /></a></p>
<p>Actually the the one by OLPC look cooler than the Asus one.</p>
<p>I guess the editor at notebookreview was quoting Asus because is how they made the announcement according to this <a href="http://uk.news.yahoo.com/16/20090304/ttc-asus-shows-off-goodies-to-cebit-hord-6315470.html" target="_blank">news piece</a>.</p>
<p>It’s funny how much the words revolutionary, unique, special and first of its kind, are used today. Correct if I’m wrong, but the last time a product launch that lived to its hype of calling it revolutionary was the iPhone. Even if its not perfect, it changed the industry. Other examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>the Asus Eee was revolutionary the notebook industry, what manufacturer doesn&#8217;t produce netbooks,</li>
<li>the Wii was revolutionized the gamming industry by producing a console appealing to non gamers,</li>
<li>Guitar <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">H</span>ero, not sure about it but hell it changed how we look at music and games</li>
</ul>
<p>However, Asus dual-screen is not, you can’t call it revolutionary when somebody already has published the same concept.</p>
<p>Sometimes we try to impress other so much, that the only ones that are impress are ourselves. I guess the lasting impressions are those that don’t seek to impress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gtothesquare.com/2009/03/06/why-asus-new-dual-display-concept-is-not-revolutionary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
